ProveIt Supplements

Independent, evidence-based supplement analysis.

✓ Not Sponsored

✓ No Paid Reviews

✓ Science-Based

Company

  • About Us
  • Our Methodology
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • Authors

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Affiliate Disclosure

Resources

  • All Categories
  • Ingredient Database
  • Browse Supplements
  • FAQ

© 2025 ProveIt Supplements. All rights reserved.

Medical Disclaimer: The information provided is for educational purposes only and is not intended as medical advice. Always consult with a qualified healthcare professional before starting any supplement regimen.

Prove It
Browse SupplementsBlogAuthorsAboutMethodologyFAQ
Get Your Personalized Supplement StackSupplement Stack Quiz
Menu
HomeBrowse SupplementsBlogAuthorsAboutMethodologyFAQ
Back

Campsiandra Angustifolia Bark Extract

Also known as: Campsiandra angustifolia bark extract, Cumanda, Campsiandra angustifolia

Overview

Campsiandra angustifolia bark extract, commonly known as Cumanda, is derived from a tree native to South America. Traditionally, indigenous populations have utilized this botanical extract for its purported medicinal properties, particularly as a natural aphrodisiac and a rejuvenating agent. While it is marketed as a plant-based botanical supplement, primarily for sexual enhancement and potential immunomodulatory effects, the scientific research supporting these claims is very limited. Most available information stems from ethnobotanical accounts and preliminary pharmacological studies. There is a notable absence of comprehensive systematic reviews or meta-analyses specifically investigating the efficacy and safety of Campsiandra angustifolia bark extract, highlighting a significant gap in robust clinical evidence.

Benefits

Traditional uses of Campsiandra angustifolia bark extract include its application as an aphrodisiac and for sexual enhancement. These effects are theoretically linked to phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibition, a mechanism observed in some erectile dysfunction treatments. While other plants within the Fabaceae family have shown PDE5 inhibitory activity due to their flavonoid and isoflavone content, direct evidence specifically for Campsiandra angustifolia is currently lacking. There are no high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or meta-analyses available that specifically evaluate the benefits of this extract. Anecdotal and ethnobotanical reports also suggest potential immunoprotective and anti-inflammatory effects, but these claims have not been substantiated by rigorous clinical research.

How it works

The proposed mechanism of action for Campsiandra angustifolia bark extract primarily revolves around the hypothesis of PDE5 inhibition. It is speculated that flavonoid compounds within the extract could enhance penile blood flow and improve erection physiology, similar to the effects observed in other species belonging to the Fabaceae family. Additionally, some animal studies on related botanical species suggest a possible modulation of inflammatory mediators and immune cell activity. However, there is no direct molecular target identification or detailed pharmacokinetic data available specifically for Campsiandra angustifolia bark extract. Information regarding its absorption and bioavailability in the human body is also not reported in the scientific literature.

Side effects

There is a significant lack of published clinical safety data or documented adverse event profiles specifically for Campsiandra angustifolia bark extract. While traditional use might suggest a degree of tolerability, the absence of controlled safety studies means that potential risks cannot be definitively ruled out. The scientific literature does not contain any documented drug interactions or contraindications associated with its use. Due to the complete absence of toxicological or pharmacovigilance data, extreme caution is advised when considering the use of this extract. Users should be aware that the full spectrum of potential side effects, drug interactions, and contraindications remains unknown.

Dosage

Currently, there are no established dosing guidelines for Campsiandra angustifolia bark extract derived from clinical trials. Traditional preparations typically involve infusions or decoctions made from the bark, but these methods lack standardization. The absence of standardized extract formulations and comprehensive pharmacokinetic studies prevents the formulation of evidence-based dosing recommendations. Therefore, any dosage used would be speculative and not supported by scientific research. There are no known upper limits or safety thresholds defined for this extract, further emphasizing the lack of safety data.

FAQs

Is Campsiandra angustifolia effective for erectile dysfunction?

No, there is no high-quality clinical evidence to support its efficacy for erectile dysfunction. Theoretical PDE5 inhibition is based on related species, not direct studies on Campsiandra angustifolia itself.

Is Campsiandra angustifolia safe to use?

The safety of Campsiandra angustifolia has not been formally evaluated through clinical studies. Traditional use does not guarantee safety, and there is a lack of toxicological data.

How should Campsiandra angustifolia be taken?

Traditionally, it is consumed as a bark infusion or decoction. However, there are no clinical guidelines or standardized recommendations for its preparation or dosage.

Research Sources

  • https://magistralbr.caldic.com/storage/product-files/1230605405.pdf – This source is a product file that mentions Campsiandra angustifolia and its traditional use as an aphrodisiac, linking it to potential PDE5 inhibition. It suggests that the mechanism is similar to other Fabaceae family plants containing flavonoids and isoflavones, but provides no direct clinical evidence for Campsiandra angustifolia itself.
  • https://restorativemedicine.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Toronto-Proceedings-2018-pgs-1-91.pdf – This document, likely conference proceedings, refers to ethnobotanical reports suggesting potential immunoprotective and anti-inflammatory effects of Campsiandra angustifolia. However, it notes that these claims lack verification by rigorous clinical research.
  • https://ethnobotanyjournal.org/index.php/era/article/download/6401/2014/61059 – This ethnobotanical study documents the traditional use of Campsiandra angustifolia by indigenous populations for medicinal purposes. While it provides insight into historical applications, it does not offer clinical validation or controlled trial data.
  • https://aonm.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Webinar-Armin-Viruses-6th-March-2024.pdf – This source, a webinar document, mentions Campsiandra angustifolia in the context of traditional use as a rejuvenating agent. It highlights the limited research and the need for more rigorous studies to validate its purported benefits.
  • https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31585179/ – This PubMed entry is a systematic review on Pycnogenol for cardiometabolic health. It is included as an example of the type of high-quality evidence (systematic review) that is currently missing for Campsiandra angustifolia, emphasizing the need for similar rigorous research.