ProveIt Supplements

Independent, evidence-based supplement analysis.

✓ Not Sponsored

✓ No Paid Reviews

✓ Science-Based

Company

  • About Us
  • Our Methodology
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • Authors

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Affiliate Disclosure

Resources

  • All Categories
  • Ingredient Database
  • Browse Supplements
  • FAQ

© 2025 ProveIt Supplements. All rights reserved.

Medical Disclaimer: The information provided is for educational purposes only and is not intended as medical advice. Always consult with a qualified healthcare professional before starting any supplement regimen.

Prove It
Browse SupplementsBlogAuthorsAboutMethodologyFAQ
Get Your Personalized Supplement StackSupplement Stack Quiz
Menu
HomeBrowse SupplementsBlogAuthorsAboutMethodologyFAQ
Back

Epazote Aerial Part Extract

Also known as: Epazote, Mexican tea, wormseed, Chenopodium ambrosioides, Dysphania ambrosioides

Overview

Epazote aerial part extract is derived from the leaves and seeds of Dysphania ambrosioides, a plant with a long history of traditional use in Latin American folk medicine. This extract is rich in various phytochemicals, including polyphenols (such as rutin, quercetin, and chrysin), terpenoids (like ascaridole and iso-ascaridole), and essential oils. The primary areas of scientific investigation for epazote extract include its potential antioxidant, antimicrobial, antiparasitic, and osteoinductive properties. While promising, most of the current research is at a preclinical stage, primarily involving in vitro studies or animal models. High-quality human randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are scarce, indicating that the evidence base, though moderate in some areas like phytochemical profiling and bioactivity assays, lacks robust clinical validation. The extract's composition and efficacy can vary significantly depending on the extraction method used.

Benefits

Epazote aerial part extract has demonstrated several potential benefits, primarily in preclinical settings. Its **antioxidant activity** is significant, with both aqueous and ethanolic extracts showing strong free radical scavenging capacity in vitro, attributed to their rich content of polyphenols and flavonoids. This suggests a role in mitigating oxidative stress. The extract also exhibits notable **antimicrobial and antiparasitic effects**, showing inhibitory activity against multidrug-resistant bacteria (e.g., E. coli, P. aeruginosa, MRSA) and protozoa, with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values typically ranging from 120 to 230 µg/mL. This effect is largely linked to its terpenoid content. Furthermore, in vitro studies on MC3T3 pre-osteoblast cells indicate an **osteoinductive potential**, as the extract increased alkaline phosphatase activity at concentrations of 50-150 µg/mL, suggesting a possible role in stimulating bone formation. However, it is crucial to note that population-specific benefits have not been established due to the absence of clinical trials. Effect sizes are mostly reported as in vitro IC50 or MIC values, and their clinical significance remains unconfirmed. The time course of benefits in humans is also not well-defined.

How it works

The mechanisms of action for Epazote aerial part extract are primarily linked to its diverse phytochemical composition. Its **antioxidant effects** are attributed to polyphenolic compounds, such as rutin, quercetin, and kaempferol derivatives, which effectively neutralize reactive oxygen species. The **antimicrobial activity** is largely due to terpenoids, particularly ascaridole, which is believed to disrupt microbial cell membranes and inhibit their growth. The observed **osteoinductive effects** in bone cells may involve the modulation of alkaline phosphatase activity and other pathways crucial for mineralization. However, the extract's bioavailability and pharmacokinetics in the human body are not yet well characterized, and the specific extraction method significantly influences the profile and concentration of its active compounds.

Side effects

Comprehensive human safety data and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) specifically assessing the adverse effects of Epazote aerial part extract are currently unavailable. While traditional use suggests low acute toxicity at typical doses, it is important to note that ascaridole, a key component, is known to be toxic at high concentrations. Animal studies have indicated no acute or subacute toxicity at moderate doses, but a detailed and exhaustive safety profiling is still lacking. There is currently no documented information regarding potential drug interactions or contraindications in clinical literature. Due to the limited data, caution is strongly advised for pregnant individuals and those with liver impairment. Without robust clinical safety data, the full spectrum of potential side effects, their severity, and frequency in humans remain largely unknown. Users should exercise prudence and consult healthcare professionals before use, especially given the presence of potentially toxic compounds at higher doses.

Dosage

There are no established clinical dosing guidelines for Epazote aerial part extract due to the significant lack of human randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Most available data on effective concentrations come from experimental in vitro studies, where concentrations typically range from 50 to 150 µg/mL for demonstrating bioactivity. It is crucial to understand that the specific extraction methods (e.g., aqueous versus ethanolic) profoundly influence the yield and potency of active compounds in the extract, making direct comparisons or extrapolations challenging. While traditional medicine practices involve oral dosing, these vary widely and are not standardized. Standardized extracts with defined active compound concentrations are not well-defined or commercially available for clinical use. Therefore, without clear clinical evidence, any specific dosage recommendations for human consumption cannot be provided, and caution is advised.

FAQs

Is epazote extract safe for human consumption?

Limited human safety data exists. Traditional use suggests safety at low doses, but toxicity is possible at high concentrations due to compounds like ascaridole. Caution is advised.

What are the expected benefits?

Preclinical studies indicate antioxidant, antimicrobial, and potential bone health effects. These benefits have primarily been observed in laboratory settings (in vitro) and animal models.

How soon do effects appear?

The time course of effects in humans is unknown due to a lack of clinical studies. In vitro effects are typically observed within days in laboratory experiments.

Can it replace conventional antibiotics or bone therapies?

No, there is no clinical evidence to support its use as a replacement for standard medical treatments like antibiotics or bone therapies. It should not be used as such.

Research Sources

  • https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=112718 – This study analyzed phytochemicals in Epazote extracts from Togo, identifying secondary metabolites. It found that both ethanolic and aqueous extracts exhibited significant antioxidant activity, providing insights into the chemical basis of its traditional uses. The research was limited to in vitro chemical assays.
  • https://www.scielo.br/j/pboci/a/3bZPVDvKsCmqMtdHcXJKvGq/ – This in vitro cell culture study investigated the effect of Epazote alcoholic extract on MC3T3 pre-osteoblast cells. It demonstrated a dose-dependent increase in alkaline phosphatase activity, suggesting the extract's potential to stimulate bone formation. The findings are promising but require in vivo and clinical confirmation.
  • https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12251798/ – This review and phytochemical profiling study identified various polyphenols and terpenoids in Epazote. It highlighted the extract's antimicrobial activity against resistant bacteria, providing a comprehensive overview of its chemical composition and potential bioactivities. The data is largely preclinical, with no human RCTs.
  • https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pharmacology/articles/10.3389/fphar.2020.01160/xml/nlm?isPublishedV2=false – This study, while not directly cited in the text as a specific finding, is a general reference for the safety profile of Dysphania ambrosioides. It likely contributes to the understanding that detailed safety profiling in animals is lacking, and comprehensive human safety data is unavailable, supporting the need for caution.