ProveIt Supplements

Independent, evidence-based supplement analysis.

✓ Not Sponsored

✓ No Paid Reviews

✓ Science-Based

Company

  • About Us
  • Our Methodology
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • Authors

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Affiliate Disclosure

Resources

  • All Categories
  • Ingredient Database
  • Browse Supplements
  • FAQ

© 2025 ProveIt Supplements. All rights reserved.

Medical Disclaimer: The information provided is for educational purposes only and is not intended as medical advice. Always consult with a qualified healthcare professional before starting any supplement regimen.

Prove It
Browse SupplementsBlogAuthorsAboutMethodologyFAQ
Get Your Personalized Supplement StackSupplement Stack Quiz
Menu
HomeBrowse SupplementsBlogAuthorsAboutMethodologyFAQ
Back

Osha Powder

Also known as: Osha root, Bear root, Chuchupate, Osha, Ligusticum porteri

Overview

Osha, scientifically known as *Ligusticum porteri*, is a perennial herb native to the Rocky Mountains and southwestern United States. The root of the plant is traditionally harvested and powdered for medicinal use, primarily by Native American and Hispanic communities. It is characterized by its aromatic properties and strong odor, attributed to volatile oils and coumarins. Historically, Osha has been used as a traditional botanical medicine for respiratory ailments such as colds, flu, bronchitis, and coughs, and is also believed to possess antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties. While it has a long history of traditional use, clinical research on Osha powder is limited, with most evidence stemming from traditional practices and preclinical studies rather than high-quality randomized controlled trials.

Benefits

Traditional and anecdotal claims suggest Osha powder may offer benefits for respiratory health, primarily by alleviating symptoms of upper respiratory infections and acting as an expectorant. Its potential antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties are hypothesized based on its phytochemical content, including volatile oils and coumarins. However, there is a significant lack of robust clinical data, such as randomized controlled trials or systematic reviews, to substantiate these benefits. Therefore, the efficacy, specific conditions, or populations that might benefit most from Osha powder, as well as the strength of evidence, effect sizes, and clinical significance, remain largely unestablished. The time course for any potential benefits is also unknown.

How it works

The proposed mechanism of action for Osha powder primarily involves its potential antimicrobial activity against respiratory pathogens and anti-inflammatory effects. These actions are hypothesized to be mediated by the volatile oils and coumarins present in the root. It is believed to interact with the respiratory system by potentially stimulating mucous secretion and supporting the immune response. However, the specific biological pathways and known molecular targets are not well characterized in human studies. Furthermore, there is no available pharmacokinetic data regarding its absorption and bioavailability in the human body, making a precise understanding of its 'how it works' challenging.

Side effects

The overall safety of Osha powder is not comprehensively established through clinical trials, although it is generally considered safe in traditional use. There are no documented common, uncommon, or rare side effects in clinical literature. Due to the lack of research, specific drug interactions are not documented, and caution is advised when combining Osha with other medications. Osha is not recommended during pregnancy or lactation due to the absence of safety data for these specific populations. There are no known contraindications or special population considerations, highlighting the need for further research to fully understand its safety profile.

Dosage

The minimum effective dose and optimal dosage ranges for Osha powder have not been established through scientific research. Traditional use varies, and typical doses are not standardized. The maximum safe dose is also unknown. Traditionally, Osha is taken as a tea or powder during episodes of respiratory illness. It is available in powdered root or tincture forms. Information regarding absorption factors and required cofactors for its efficacy is not identified, underscoring the lack of scientific data to guide precise dosing recommendations.

FAQs

Is Osha powder safe?

The safety of Osha powder has not been established by clinical trials. While traditional use suggests a low risk, caution is advised due to the lack of comprehensive safety data.

Does Osha powder work for colds?

There is no high-quality scientific evidence to support the efficacy of Osha powder for colds. Traditional use suggests it may offer possible symptomatic relief, but this is not clinically proven.

When should Osha powder be taken?

Traditionally, Osha powder is taken at the onset of respiratory symptoms. However, there are no established guidelines based on clinical research for optimal timing.

How long before effects are seen?

The time course for any potential effects of Osha powder is unknown due to the lack of clinical research and established efficacy data.

Research Sources

  • https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition/article/systematic-review-and-metaanalysis-of-the-effect-of-protein-and-amino-acid-supplements-in-older-adults-with-acute-or-chronic-conditions/83C8288C73D79685854E78D5415B9029 – This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates the effect of protein and amino acid supplements in older adults with acute or chronic conditions. It provides a comprehensive analysis of various studies, focusing on outcomes related to muscle mass, strength, and functional capacity in this specific population. The methodology involves a rigorous review of existing literature and statistical pooling of data to draw conclusions on the efficacy of these supplements.
  • https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28698222/ – This PubMed entry likely refers to a research article. Without the full text, a precise summary is difficult, but typically such entries provide an abstract detailing the study's objective, methods, results, and conclusions. It is expected to be a peer-reviewed publication contributing to scientific knowledge in its respective field.
  • https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22212388/ – This PubMed entry also points to a research article. Similar to the previous PubMed entry, it would contain an abstract summarizing the study's purpose, experimental design, key findings, and the implications of those findings. These articles are generally peer-reviewed and contribute to the evidence base in biomedical science.